[BreachExchange] 6 Items that Should Be on the New Federal CISO’s To-Do List

[Audrey McNeil]

http://opensources.info/6-items-that-should-be-on-the-
new-federal-cisos-to-do-list/

In his final budget proposal, President Barack Obama highlighted
cybersecurity as a top priority and proposed a new position for the federal
government: a chief information security officer.

As part of Obama’s Cybersecurity National Action Plan, this new CISO would
be tasked with modernizing government IT and transforming how the
government manages cybersecurity.

While the new CISO, retired Brig. Gen. Gregory Touhill, was just named in
September 2016 and is just getting started, the one thing we know with
absolute certainty is he will have a difficult job ahead. This is because
federal government IT systems have more holes than a colander.

And the next time one of them is breached, Touhill will be the person sent
to Capitol Hill to explain what went wrong—similar to how an enterprise
CISO is sent to the CEO’s office to explain when a security breach happens.

Imagine for a moment you have been appointed as the new U.S. federal
government CISO. What do you do to secure the federal information
infrastructures? The checklist could be analogous to the to-do list for the
enterprise CISO.

1. Know your leverage.

You do have one important form of leverage as a federal official; every
agency head knows a public breach is likely to be followed by a
congressional hearing. Agencies that work with your office to develop
effective security policies will find it easier to convince Congress and
the public the breach was because of misfortune rather than carelessness.

2. Discontinue use of outdated systems.

Security must become your priority in IT infrastructure, not the exception.
An all-encompassing structure that can withstand any and all cyberattacks
must be a goal for any enterprise CISO.

Part of making security a priority is discontinuing use of operating
systems that are no longer supported. Some parts of the government are
still running Windows NT 4.0, a family of Microsoft operating systems,
released 20 years ago.

The federal government can’t expect the IT industry to believe the
government is serious about IT security when it is begging vendors to
continue support for obsolete operating systems with a multitude of known
vulnerabilities.

When Microsoft announced the end-of-life for its Windows XP operating
system last year, it was reported the U.S. Navy paid Microsoft additional
funds to extend support for another year and is almost certain to continue
to pay for future support. It is now nine years and counting since Windows
XP was replaced by Vista.

3. Address salary woes.

Similar to the challenges an enterprise CISO has today, one of the main
obstacles to improving security is the federal government salary system. It
is not possible to pay a network administrator or a programmer a
competitive salary on civil service scales, so technical experts are
typically hired as contractors at a 200 percent markup.

According to Edward Snowden’s employer, Booz Allen Hamilton, he was paid
$122,000 a year. That means Snowden, at age 29, would have been at grade
15, the very top of the civil service pay scale for the Washington, D.C.,
area. The highest grade at which an agency could recruit someone like
Snowden would be grade 12, starting with a salary of just $75,000.

We don’t know how much the National Security Agency paid for his services,
of course. But a typical consulting rate for government work with a
security clearance would be $1,500 per day or $360,000 for a 48-week year.

The private sector has its own idiosyncrasies, but the needs are the
same—if on a different scale. Enterprise CISOs are answerable to CEOs for
the cost-effectiveness of the security system they choose, as well as its
effectiveness.

In the current climate of ever-present threat, however, effectiveness may
trump cost, given the possible costs of a massive breach. Costs incurred
are not only tangible but also far-reaching, when consumer confidence
becomes an issue.

4. Consider bringing IT in-house.

Congress will squeal as beltway contractors are major donors to both
parties. But the only way to get a handle on federal IT security and IT
cost overruns is to bring core IT functions in-house and pay the staff
directly. Contractors will still be needed to develop new systems. But the
contracts awarded should be broken down into small parts whose success or
failure can be objectively measured rather than block contracts of $100
million or more.

5. Identify preventable attacks.

In each and every one of the high-profile IT breaches that have affected
the federal government in the past five years, technology was available
that could have prevented the breach, just as enterprise CISOs have the
ability to prevent the all too prevalent malware and ransomware attacks.

Perhaps the most important discovery following the Snowden breach at NSA is
the agency charged with protecting U.S. government cybersecurity was unable
to protect itself. Why did a 29-year-old contract employee have access to a
file server holding unencrypted files describing the most secret NSA
activities? There were preventative measures available.

6. Hold vendors accountable.

The principal problem with the vast majority of enterprise software systems
is they are too hard to use. And why make them any other way? Usability
engineering costs time and money, and in the enterprise space, the person
who makes the buying decision is almost never the person who has to use it.

Enterprise security applications tend to be particularly bad, because what
is required is not an application that can be used securely, but one that
allows all the right security standards boxes to be ticked. And ticking
boxes does not guarantee interoperability.

As one person complained to me: “Yes, the product ticks both the boxes. But
the product doesn’t support both at the same time, not unless the customer
pays extra.”

The federal IT security crisis can only begin to be reined in when vendors
start to deliver application software secure by default and as easy-to-use
in its secure state as when the security is switched off. As with any
enterprise security solution, at the federal level and in the private
sector, dependability and adaptability are vitally important.

If a CISO can tailor a system to meet the particular needs of the
organization and feel confident in its efficacy, the results can justify
the costs.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.riskbasedsecurity.com/pipermail/breachexchange/attachments/20161019/2502bd53/attachment.html>