[BreachExchange] DDoS Attacks Surge, Organizations Struggle to Respond

[Destry Winant]

http://www.darkreading.com/attacks-breaches/ddos-attacks-surge-organizations-struggle-to-respond/d/d-id/1328788

Despite heightened awareness of distributed denial-of-service (DDoS)
attacks, organizations are taking longer to detect and respond to them.

Neustar, as it has done the previous three years, surveyed some 1,010
CISOs, CIOs, CTOs, and other corporate executives from around the world on
the frequency and impact of DDoS attacks on their organizations. About 50%
of the respondents identified themselves as belonging to companies with
revenues of between $500 million and $1 billion.

The results show that DDoS attacks have increased in frequency and volume
even as organizations are struggling to detect and mitigate them quickly.
About 850 respondents, or 84% of the total, say their organizations have
experienced at least one DDoS attack in the past 12 months, compared to the
73% who said the same thing in last year’s survey.

Eighty-six percent of those 850 organizations say they have contended with
multiple DDoS attacks over the past year. That number represents a 4%
increase over the proportion of organizations who say they had experienced
more than one DDoS attack last year.

Nearly half of the impacted organizations say their DDoS attacks coincided
with some form of breach or malicious activity on their networks, including
data theft and ransomware. For instance, 47% report discovering virus
activity on their network after a DDoS attack, 43% cite malware as being
activated, and 32% report customer data theft.

The survey found that in many cases victim organizations did not know they
were the targets of a DDoS attack until a third-party or  a customer
alerted them. In fact, about one in 5 victim organizations over the past
year learned about a DDoS attack only after being notified about it by an
external third-party or by their customers.

Hours to ID a DDoS

Globally, slightly more than half of all organizations that sustained a
DDoS attack required a minimum of three hours to positively identify it,
while 38% say it took them between three and five hours. On average,
victims needed about three hours to respond to a DDoS attack, which was
slower overall than the response times reported by respondents in last
year’s survey.

The numbers are significant because of the potential losses that companies
can experience as the result of a DDoS attack. More than 6 in 10 of the
organizations surveyed estimate they would lose up to $100,000 in revenue
per hour in the event of a disruption caused by a DDoS attack. Some 31% say
they could lose between $250,000 to $1 million per hour, while 12% claim
potential revenue losses of over $1 million per hour.

Inexperience dealing with DDoS attacks could be one reason for the delayed
detection and response, says Barrett Lyon, Neustar’s head of research and
development. Another is that large attacks that take infrastructures
offline are rather easy to detect, but smaller ones are much harder to pin
down.

"To those who have limited experience in mitigating attacks or have low-end
protection, small complex attacks may be initially treated with performance
investigations and diagnostics before arriving at the conclusion of an
attack," Lyon says. "Unfortunately, many types of DDoS attacks ramp up
quickly and can be over in a matter of minutes."

This can be, fast enough to bypass detection but long enough for external
users to notice especially if the target is a Web-based service such as
online banking, airline reservations, or utility payment systems.

Spike in Connectionless LDAP DDoS Attacks

The Nesutar survey
<https://hello.neustar.biz/201705-Security-Solutions-DDoS-SOC-Report-LP.html?utm_medium=web%20referral&utm_source=blog-security&utm_campaign=201705-securitysolutions-ddos-ddossocreportblogsecurity&ucid=70139000001bbzpaa2>
uncovered a significant increase in DDoS attacks involving the abuse of the
Connectionless LDAP (CLDAP) protocol in the first quarter of 2017. CLDAP is
a version of LDAP that many organizations use for directory services — and
inadvertently also leave exposed to Internet access.

Unlike LDAP, which uses the Transmission Control Protocol (TCP) for
communication, CLDAP uses the less secure User Datagram Protocol (UDP),
making it somewhat easier to exploit in DDoS attacks.

Earlier this year, content distribution network Akamai published an alert
noting a substantial increase in CLDAP-enabled DDoS attacks over the past
several months. The company had described
<http://www.darkreading.com/attacks-breaches/new-breed-of-ddos-attack-on-the-rise/d/d-id/1328620>
the new trend as troubling because of the extent of attack traffic
amplification an attacker could achieve by exploiting CLDAP services that
were exposed on the Internet.

In a similar report
<https://www.corero.com/blog/813-cldap-attacks-remain-a-relevant-and-growing-ddos-attack-vector.html>,
security vendor Corero Network Security reported seeing a remarkable 416
CLDAP attacks since last October. The largest of these attacks had a peak
bandwidth of 33Gbps, while the average volume was around 10Gbps.

Neustar says the largest CLDAP-enabled DDoS attack it has mitigated so far
this year had a peak bandwidth size of 20.9 Gbps and lasted 14 minutes. In
terms of size, that was much smaller than some of the terabit-scale DDoS
attacks generated by the Mirai-botnet last year. Still, the incident
demonstrated that CLDAP attacks can generate considerable momentum and are
something to keep an eye on for the rest of the year, according to Neustar.

"A few years ago, a two gigabits-per-second attack could be quite
disruptive, but its size was restricted to the amount of resources that
could be economically and electronically marshaled," Lyon says. "Now,
attackers can leverage resources such as web domains that use DNS Security
Extensions [DNSSEC] to create tremendous amplification."

He points to a Neustar study last year, which identified a typical
amplification factor of 29 for an 80-byte query: The largest attack was a
217-time amplification of an 80-byte query. "Better economics, more potent
DDoS creation code being shared, and many [easily exploitable] are driving
up attack size," he warns.

Nuestar's survey also suggests that the growing deployment of Internet of
Things (IoT) devices such as connected sensors and actuators will pose new
DDoS-related challenges for organizations. Of the organizations using IoT
devices that became victims of a DDoS attack last year, 32% report damage
to physical equipment, or a network compromise.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.riskbasedsecurity.com/pipermail/breachexchange/attachments/20170503/bfcd1c59/attachment.html>