[BreachExchange] 5 Objectives for Establishing an API-First Security Strategy
Destry Winant
destry at riskbasedsecurity.com
Thu Apr 15 11:00:00 EDT 2021
https://www.darkreading.com/application-security/5-objectives-for-establishing-an-api-first-security-strategy/a/d-id/1340622
With APIs predicted to be the most common attack vector by 2022, an
API-first security strategy is critical now more than ever.
Application programming interfaces (APIs) are at the center of just
about everything in the digital world. For consumers, APIs underpin
everything from smartphone apps to electronic payments and more. For
enterprises, APIs have enabled the shift from inefficient monolithic
application architectures to more agile and modular microservices
architectures that are fast becoming the standard for emerging
technologies.
It's fair to say that almost every piece of software built today
either uses an API or is an API. And our reliance on these crucial
pieces of code to share information between applications and systems
has only grown with the increased use of remote services and
applications due to the pandemic.
When thinking about how APIs enable remote work, look at communication
tools like Slack that depend on APIs for many features and
integrations. Even a task as simple as scheduling a videoconference
with a colleague is made possible by API-driven services. As APIs
continually become more convenient for those with less technical
training, the knowledge barrier to entry will keep getting lower.
As APIs' popularity rises, so does their prevalence as an attack
vector for cybercriminals because bad actors have always loved the
most target-rich technologies. When each API request is another
opportunity for hackers to exploit, API security is crucial.
Gartner forecasts that APIs will become the most common attack vector
by next year. Yet despite higher awareness of the need for API
security, breaches continue to happen.
Given this context, the time has come for organizations to adopt an
API-first security strategy. Companies should be mindful of the
enormous — and ever-increasing — amount of data they're transmitting
through APIs and make more robust security a priority at each stage in
the API development life cycle.
What does an API-first security strategy look like? Here are five observations:
1. High visibility is crucial. An API-first approach is all about
acknowledging the API as a first-class citizen in an application's
design. Given the increase in vital work that the API does in
communicating between applications, APIs must have the same scrutiny
of access controls that a superuser (e.g., an IT administrative
specialist with unlimited privileges) would.
That means an emphasis on visibility and accountability. If you can't
see it, you can't account for it, and thus more visibility controls
are needed for API security. The good news is organizations don't need
to reinvent the wheel to get started. Web application firewalls
(WAFs), OWASP vulnerability scanning tools, and smart use of Transport
Layer Security (TLS) and proper authentication can all provide a
consistent set of controls and visibility.
2. REST APIs are a growing target. REST (REpresentational State
Transfer) is the duct tape of technology — it defines how systems can
be connected to (and interact with) each other by using HTTP requests
to access and use data. REST API usage has become so widespread in
enterprise application development that many companies have
difficulties defining a clear picture of all their deployments. These
visibility gaps make APIs harder to protect.
Organizations must improve at keeping an accurate, up-to-date
inventory of their REST use cases and employ secure channels like TLS
and authentication keys to reduce risk.
3. Encryption of all data is key. This is true not just when data is
at rest, but also in transit. In this encryption scenario, the API
would use TLS and authorization tokens to transmit data securely, and
the data that the API is accessing should also be encrypted. Remember
that this encryption strategy is defense in depth; there's a classic
military saying about the crucial need for redundancy that summarizes
this idea well: "Two is one and one is none."
4. Credential stuffing is still a huge problem and an evolving threat.
Credential stuffing is the practice of using an automated injection of
stolen credentials to gain unauthorized access. Companies have gotten
better at securing their front-end applications and webpages to defend
against credential stuffing. Still, hackers increasingly have been
targeting back-end APIs that historically tended to have fewer
implemented security controls.
Evidence of this can be seen in a recent Akamai report that showed
that one in every five attempts to gain unauthorized access to user
accounts is now done through APIs rather than user-facing login pages.
Companies must account for this trend in their API-first security
strategy and do a better job of protecting back-end APIs from these
attacks.
5. Automated checks should be standard practice. I'm repeatedly
frustrated by how rarely I see automated security checks as part of a
CI/CD pipeline, if they are implemented at all. A mature application
security team should work with the engineering squads to design and
incorporate security into pipelines and allow an organization to scale
security with its product offerings.
Rather than asking why this practice isn't common, let's ask why it
isn't more straightforward and cheaper to implement security in the
CI/CD pipeline. Why do some developer tools not include features to
make security checks more manageable? Why is it so expensive to audit
for API security issues on running services? What are the dev tool
vendors doing to improve this experience for their users and help
developers punch above their security weight class?
I hope and expect the API industry will step up and better address
these questions and concerns in 2021 and beyond.
As these five points show, pursuing an API-first security strategy and
baking API security into the software development life cycle requires
prioritization and intent. But it's well worth the effort. A few
minutes of proactive security testing can save hours or days of
downtime and legal fees down the road.
More information about the BreachExchange
mailing list